Tuesday, 19 February 2013

Real or Not Real?



I’m going to be mentioning The Hunger Games in this post, so the quote (which those of you who have read Mockingjay will recognise) seemed suitable. 

In one of my university seminars today, we began to discuss the idea of whether contemporary books have started to become less ‘real’. Obviously, many books were mentioned, such as The Hunger Games, Game of Thrones and Twilight, to name a view. Fantasy, paranormal and dystopia have become huge genres in recent years, and in many respects it seems like we as a culture are moving further and further away from reality.

Let’s look at some aspects of the aforementioned books. An arena where children fight to the death? A place where winter can last years with dragons? Vampires? None of these things are exactly real. They all look at an exaggerated reality, one which can look very distorted from ours.

But to me, these books are still ‘real’. One of the most important things for me when I’m reading is whether I can relate to the characters. The setting might be wildly different from anything I know, and the society they live in might seem like another world, but there will always be aspects I can relate to and things I feel are ‘real’ to me. 

Everything we write has aspects of our reality. I don’t think we can ever really separate ourselves from the world we know, as much as we may try to distance ourselves from it in fiction. We don’t know any different than our own reality, after all. So whilst we might not be reading as many books about Average Joe anymore, I don’t think this makes what we are reading any less ‘real’. Books will always be ‘real’ in some respect, even when they may not seem very real at all. 

What do you think? Do you think we are distancing ourselves from realism in fiction?

Tuesday, 12 February 2013

Why You Can Judge A Book By Its Cover



Don’t judge a book by its cover.

It’s an old saying, and perhaps the world would be a better place if we never based our decision to pick up a book purely based on its cover. 

However, this isn’t a world any of us live in.

I have definitely committed the crime of judging a book by its cover, and I know most others would say the same. Publishing companies know this: there’s a reason why art departments spend tons of money on cover design. A good cover could end up being the thing to make or break a book, particularly if the author is debuting. 

Especially in YA, I think covers are important. A cover needs to make a statement, and if you have an attractive cover, the chances are more people are going to at least pick up your book, even if they don’t buy it or even turn the first page. 

Kiersten White’s recent blog about the importance of covers to her also reflects how big a deal a cover is, not only for the readers but for authors too. Of course, a good or bad cover isn’t the be-all and end-all. But that doesn’t mean it’s not important. It’s just another thing to make it all real, to remind you hey, this is actually going to be published! 

I’ve seen some beautiful covers out there. Kiersten White’s Paranormalcy series, Kami Garcia and Margaret Stohl’s Beautiful Creatures series, Maggie Stiefvater’s British Shiver trilogy covers to name a few. I remember my decision to pick up the incredible Uglies trilogy by Scott Westerfeld was mainly due to the unusual covers (which have sadly been redesigned since the many years ago that I picked up the series). 

I can only hope that if I’m ever published, I’ll be happy with whatever cover the publishing company deems worthy. 

Do you judge books by their covers? Can you think of any covers which have particularly stood out to you?

Saturday, 9 February 2013

Why I Love The Prominence of YA



In the last few years dystopia as a genre has become more and more prominent, particularly in YA. Obviously books like The Hunger Games, Veronica Roth’s Divergent series and various other books have helped this new market trend, but personally, I think it’s a great thing dystopia is becoming more popular, particularly amongst young people. 

The main aim of dystopia is to challenge aspects of our society. For example The Hunger Games looks at media culture, government control, the manipulation of the celebrity. Pure by Julianna Baggott questions social status and environmental disaster. 

There are a multitude of things that are wrong with our society. Whilst it might not always be pleasant to admit it, dystopia helps us comes to terms with these issues, and while they may not appear as extreme as their depictions in these novels, that doesn’t mean they aren’t worth examining. 

The most frightening thing about these books is their sense of reality, and this only comes from the fact that the issues they are tackling are wholeheartedly based on problems we already face in our daily lives. They are gripping not only because of the talent of the author, but because deep down, we all know that the characters are facing real problems we have today, if only on a much bigger and more dramatic scale.

I think it’s great that YA has begun to corner the market on dystopia. The target audience of these books is the future of our society after all. Isn’t it fantastic that at such a young age they can already start to challenge the issues and problems we face today? We will always need people to challenge the concepts and notions of the world we live in. If dystopian YA novels can influence just some of these readers, and provoke them to start thinking about solutions for all these issues, the world will be a better place. 

There are many more reasons why dystopia is great. I could go on and on. However, I’ve already written an older post (although it may need updating) about the many reasons I love dystopia, and this certainly won’t be the last time I touch on this subject. But in regards to the way it will affect society’s youth, and the benefits it will have to us in the future, I think that’s worth noting. 

What do you think about dystopia? Do you think it widens our perspective, or are you not a fan of the genre?

Tuesday, 5 February 2013

Knowing Your Process



This is a slightly different post today. I wanted to think about processes: how you get to where you want to be, and what you have to do to get there. It can apply for writing, but it can apply for so many other things too, such as sports, school work, personal skills etc.

No matter what you decide to start in life, whether it be a new hobby or a new job, there always seems to be that one person who just gets it. Who, for some strange reason, is naturally absolutely amazing at what they are doing. It’s hard not to feel envious of this person and watch them have it so easy whilst you struggle to find your bearings. 

But, for me, I think knowing how I work – with any new thing I attempt to start – is a big help. I’m definitely not one of those people who is naturally good at anything. My process involves me doing things over and over again, and when everybody else around you seems to be succeeding whilst you make little (if any) progress, it can get incredibly frustrating. I’ve been doing archery since September, and watching everybody go up in scores whilst I’ve remained stuck has been somewhat awful. It’s only recently I’ve really started to see progress, and even then consistency is a long way off. 

However as frustrated as I may get, I know that this is just how I work. This is my process. In order to get anywhere, I will have to do it over and over again. I think it’s this which has made me quite a dedicated and motivated person in some respects. It makes me who I am. 

I’m not sure I will ever have a natural flair for something. If I do, I’m sure I’ll enjoy it whilst it lasts.  But at the end of the day, it’s doing things over and over again which will make me successful. So, I’ll let myself feel envious, but only for a moment. Then I’ll simply get back to what I’m doing, and try again. 

What’s your process?